Legal Opinion

United States v. Campbell

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided August 26, 2010No. 4:09CR3023PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RICHARD G. KOPF, District Judge.

Sometimes, judges should actually look at the child pornography that forms the basis for a conviction before fashioning an appropriate sentence. See, e.g., United States v. Cunningham, 680 F.Supp.2d 844, 854-855 (N.D.Ohio 2010) (“Thus, the Court implores any reviewing Court to personally examine the images at issue and not simply rely on a written description of their contents. The Court acknowledges that the review of such images is, to say the least, uncomfortable. There are some images that are haunting, and they cannot be unseen.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. Darrin Todd HaackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Irizarry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Miller Ex Rel. MM v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. LaBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. State of West Virginia v. Shawn Thomas RigglemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. United States v. AbrahamDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2013
  4. United States v. NashDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
  5. People v. LaBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API