Legal Opinion

Witt v. Northwest Aluminum Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 21, 2001No. CR 99-1715-BRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, District Judge.

This employment case comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (# 18). For the following reasons, the Motion is DENIED.

THE COMPLAINT

Plaintiff worked for Defendant from 1987 until December 1998 or January 1999. In June 1998, Plaintiff was diagnosed with “claudication, a permanent condition that results in vascular insufficiencies in both legs.” 1 Plaintiff claims his doctors ordered him not to walk more than 50 to 100 feet without taking a rest. Plaintiff further alleges Defendant was aware Plaintiff suffered from this condition.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Ronald Y. Chuang and Linda Chuang v. University of California Davis, Board of Trustees and Fitz-Roy CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Stewart v. Happy Herman's Cheshire Bridge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Granas v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
  2. Rebecca Seelye v. Community Counseling SolutionsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
  3. Spring v. Allegany-Limestone Central School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API