Witt v. Northwest Aluminum Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BROWN, District Judge.
This employment case comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (# 18). For the following reasons, the Motion is DENIED.
THE COMPLAINT
Plaintiff worked for Defendant from 1987 until December 1998 or January 1999. In June 1998, Plaintiff was diagnosed with “claudication, a permanent condition that results in vascular insufficiencies in both legs.” 1 Plaintiff claims his doctors ordered him not to walk more than 50 to 100 feet without taking a rest. Plaintiff further alleges Defendant was aware Plaintiff suffered from this condition.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ronald Y. Chuang and Linda Chuang v. University of California Davis, Board of Trustees and Fitz-Roy CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Stewart v. Happy Herman's Cheshire Bridge, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Robert Barnett v. U.S. Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Granas v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Rebecca Seelye v. Community Counseling SolutionsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- Spring v. Allegany-Limestone Central School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024