Legal Opinion

United States v. Hardin

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 20, 1998No. 96-9449PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATCHETT, Chief Judge:

Appellant Kenneth Hardin challenges his conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Concluding that Hardin’s stipulation to his prior felony conviction removed the government’s burden of proof on that issue, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

A federal grand jury indicted appellant Kenneth Hardin for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(a)(2). Hardin pleaded not guilty. Prior to trial, the government and Hardin entered into a written stipulation:

It is stipulated and agreed, by and between the United States of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  3. United States of America v. Kerry PoulackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. AyoubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Gilliam, Darron G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API