United States v. Hardin
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Chief Judge:
Appellant Kenneth Hardin challenges his conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Concluding that Hardin’s stipulation to his prior felony conviction removed the government’s burden of proof on that issue, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
A federal grand jury indicted appellant Kenneth Hardin for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(a)(2). Hardin pleaded not guilty. Prior to trial, the government and Hardin entered into a written stipulation:
It is stipulated and agreed, by and between the United States of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- United States of America v. Kerry PoulackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. AyoubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Gilliam, Darron G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.