State v. Tomlinson
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, Justice.
Defendant appeals conviction and sentence for delivery of cocaine in violation of § 204.401(1), The Code. He contends the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on his defense of entrapment. We reverse the trial court.
In State v. Mullen, 216 N.W.2d 375, 382 (Iowa 1974), we adopted an objective test for the defense of entrapment. We held entrapment occurs when a law enforcement agent induces the commission of the offense, using persuasion or other means likely to cause normally law-abiding persons to commit it. Conduct merely affording a person an opportunity to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. MullenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Elkader Cooperative Company v. MattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State v. BaumannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. TrudoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- State v. Allan Banks Gibb IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.