Legal Opinion

Bear v. Standard Accident Insurance

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 19, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

In three previous cases heretofore decided, we have been compelled to deal with litigation involving the subject matter of the present appeal. Sullivan v. Duval Lumber Co., 99 Fla. 521, 126 So. Rep. 792; Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. Duval Lumber Co., 99 Fla. 525, 126 Sou. Rep. 643; Bear v. Duval Lumber Co., 112 Fla. 240, 150 Sou. Rep. 614. Many of the facts of the present controversy will be found stated in the several opinions just referred to.

In the case now before the Court the appeal is from a final decree whereby the equities of the appellants’ bill were found in favor of the defendant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. BetheaSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  2. Atlantic Shores Corp. v. ZetterlundSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. New York Life Insurance v. OatesSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Standard Accident Insurance v. Duval Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Bear v. Duval Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Standard Accident Insurance v. BearSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Donnelly v. MannSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Knight v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. Supple v. SuppleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API