Martin v. Royster Guano Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gary, J., Richland, April, 1904. Action by Benjamin Martin against Royster Guano Company. Plaintiff appeals from order of nonsuit. cite: As to construction of pleadings: Code of Proc., 180; 12 S. C., 5, 576; 25 S. C., 123; 38 S. C., 300; 56 S. C., 241; 8 S. C., 104; 29 S. C., 258; 14 S. C., 51; 27 S. C., 324, 623; 24 S. C., 81; Code of Proc., 197; 11 S. C., 122, 409; 22 S. C., 557. Error not to permit 3 S. C., 401; 33 S. C„ 361; 9 S. C., 330; Code of Proc., 194; 12 S.…
Read the full summary
Before Gary, J., Richland, April, 1904. Action by Benjamin Martin against Royster Guano Company. Plaintiff appeals from order of nonsuit. cite: As to construction of pleadings: Code of Proc., 180; 12 S. C., 5, 576; 25 S. C., 123; 38 S. C., 300; 56 S. C., 241; 8 S. C., 104; 29 S. C., 258; 14 S. C., 51; 27 S. C., 324, 623; 24 S. C., 81; Code of Proc., 197; 11 S. C., 122, 409; 22 S. C., 557. Error not to permit 3 S. C., 401; 33 S. C„ 361; 9 S. C., 330; Code of Proc., 194; 12 S. C., 173; 26 S. C., 415; 59 S. C., 81; 58 S. C., 466; 50 S. C., 397. Grounds not stated in motion for non-suit will not…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This is an appeal from an order of nonsuit. The first paragraph of the complaint alleges, that at the time thereinafter mentioned the defendant was a corporation engaged in the manufacture of fertilizers. The second and third paragraphs are as follows:
“2. That, on or about the 18th day of February, 1902, the plaintiff was in the employ of said defendant as a laborer, and, as such, was engaged in rolling a wheelbarrow, filled with an acid or fertilizer compound, from a large and high pile of the acid compound, to another part of said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Camp v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
- Lewis v. HinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
- Harmon v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kell v. Rock Hill Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Lyon v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- James v. Fountain Inn Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- McBrayer v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Whisenhunt v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.