Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 10, 1979PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

Employer Aetna Casualty & Surety Company appeals from a pro forma decree of the Superior Court, affirming an order of the Workers’ Compensation Commission. The Commission found that the employee, Kendall Gordon, is entitled to compensation for total incapacity from injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. The employer asserts that the Commission’s finding of total incapacity after August 26, 1977, is not supported by competent evidence.

We deny the appeal.

Gordon, a claims adjuster for Aetna, filed a Petition for Award of Compensation alleging that on or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Levesque v. ShoreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. Crocker v. Eastland Woolen Mill, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. Theriault v. Walsh Construction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. MacKenzie v. H. Tabenken & Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. Hamel v. Pizzagalli Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lagasse v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. Leo v. AMERICAN HOST & DERRICK COMPANYSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Keene v. Fairchild & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. Rowe v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Rugan v. Dole Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API