Weehawken Wharf Co. v. Knickerbocker Coal Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the City Court, affirming an order of the Special Term, denying the defendant’s motion to vacate a warrant of attachment.
1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.
The plaintiff obtained a warrant of attachment against the property of the defendant, on June 12, 1897, upon the single affidavit of Mr. James R. Rogers, plaintiff’s attorney, alleging, on information and belief, that defendant was about to dispose of its property with intent to defraud its creditors. Defendant obtained, on June 19, 1897, an order to show cause why the warrant of attachment should not he vacated, on the original papers upon which it was granted, and alleged in the formal affidavit, necessary to obtain the order to show cause, that “ the order (for attachment) is .subject to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tim v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Ladenburg v. Commercial Bank of NewfoundlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Hanson v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Barker v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1863
- Kokomo Straw Board Co. v. InmanNew York Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fried v. Continental Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1935