Hanson v. Marcus
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Henry Marcus and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 3d day of July, 1896, denying their motion to vacate an attachment.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
James S. Hanson, upon whose affidavit this attachment was granted, testified that he was the duly authorized agent, manager and attorney in fact of the plaintiff. Following that statement in the affidavit, he proceeded to state as of his own knowledge the facts upon which it was claimed that the plaintiff had a cause of action against the defendants. It appears from the affidavit that all the business, transacted between the plaintiff and the defendants under the agreement which lay at the foundation of the cause of action, was had with the agent; but whether or not Hanson was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ladenburg v. Commercial Bank of NewfoundlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hoormann v. Climax Cycle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Lacker v. DreherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Lacker v. DreherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Herzberg v. BoiesenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1897
- Merchants' National Bank v. Columbia Spinning Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.