Huff v. Sweetser
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from orders refusing to set aside and vacate the conclusions of law, and amend the same, and to amend the judgment accordingly. A. L. Rhodes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
The action was to have it adjudged that a deficiency judgment docketed against the land claimed by plaintiff is not a lien thereon and for an injunction restraining defendants from selling said land upon an execution. Plaintiff had judgment as prayed for. Defendants moved the court, under sections 663 and 663%, Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside and vacate the conclusions of law, and amend the same, and to amend the judgment in accordance with the amended conclusions of law. The motions were denied and defendants appeal from the judgment and the orders.
About all of the facts essential to a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Metz v. State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- Fallon v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Darrough v. Herbert Kraft Co. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Davis v. SteepsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Eby v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ball v. VogtnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Stenzel v. KronickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Reidy v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Keele v. ReichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Orphanoudakis v. OrphanoudakisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.