Legal Opinion

Spratt v. Guardian Automotive Products, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 17, 1998No. 1:97-cv-00323PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

COSBEY, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes is before the Court on Defendant Guardian Automotive Inc.’s (“Guardian”) “Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Demand for Jury Trial,” filed together with a brief in support on January 22, 1998. Plaintiff Michael Spratt (“Spratt”) filed a response on January 30, 1998, and, pursuant to the Court’s February 13,1998, Order requesting supplemental briefing, filed a surresponse on February 23, 1998. Guardian filed its reply on March 4, 1998, and the motion is ripe for review. For the reasons hereinafter…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fink v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
  2. Maher v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. Duarte v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API