City of St. George v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary disposition. Appel-lee argues that this court should dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction or summarily affirm on the basis that the appeal presents no substantial question for review. Appellant asserts that his convictions for driving without a license and failure to furnish proof of financial responsibility should be summarily reversed for manifest error. We summarily affirm his convictions.
Preliminarily, we address whether this court has jurisdiction to decide this appeal. Appellant was tried on February 6, 1991. At…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WilcoxUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Nelson v. StokerUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Hortencio v. FillisUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Salt Lake City Corporation v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
- City of St. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- State v. InglebyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004