Legal Opinion

State v. Wilcox

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1991No. 890224PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

The State of Utah appeals from the dismissal of a criminal prosecution for sexual abuse of a child. The trial court granted a motion by defendant Ray Wilcox to dismiss the information on the ground that the State had violated his right to adequate notice under the Utah Constitution by not giving him a written specification of the date, time, and place of the offense charged. The court held that by alleging that the instances of abuse occurred over a thirty-two-month period, the information did not charge Wilcox with sufficient specificity to permit him to establish an…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. SwallowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  2. Nelson v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. BlubaughCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
  4. Erickson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. R.L.G. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API