Nichols, North, Buse Co. v. Belgium Cannery
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
_ It was conceded upon the trial that if the so-called Bulk Sales Law, secs. 2317c to 2317f, Stats, (now secs. 241.18-to 241.21), applied to the transactions of June 17th and July 7, 1922, then the conditions required in order to make a valid sale, such as the making of an inventory at cost price and notifying the then existing creditors of the Green County Company, were not present. The language of the statute so far as material is as follows:
“Section 2317c. The sale, transfer, or assignment, in bulk, otherwise than in the ordinary course of trade, and in the regular prosecution of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hart v. BrierleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- New England & Savannah Steamship Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Spurr v. TravisMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Everett Produce Co. v. Smith Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Missos v. SpyrosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Patmos v. Grand Rapids Dairy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Rothchild v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
- In re SarawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- State Bank of Viroqua v. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952