Legal Opinion

Swift Canadian Co. v. Banet

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 3, 1955No. 11538_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

224 F.2d 36

SWIFT CANADIAN CO., Limited, Appellant,

v.

Albert BANET, Sali Banet and Abraham L. Perlman (Also Known as Abe Perlman), Individually and Trading as Keystone Wool Pullers.

No. 11538.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 5, 1955.

Decided June 23, 1955.

Rehearing Denied August 3, 1955.

Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, Richardson Blair, Philadelphia, Pa. (Robert L. Bast, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Robert S. Grodinsky, Philadelphia, Pa. (Manuel Sidkoff, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before GOODRICH and HASTIE, Circuit Judges, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hocking v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Baetjer v. New England Alcohol Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Dwight v. EckertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Hatcher v. FergusonIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Swift Canadian Co. v. BanetCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API