Legal Opinion

Swift Canadian Co. v. Banet

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 23, 1955No. 11538PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is an action on the part of a seller of goods to recover against the buyer for breach of contract. In the trial court each party, following the filing of a stipulation of facts, moved for summary judgment. The court granted the motion of the defendant. Plaintiff here says that it should have had the summary judgment or, at the worst, that the case should be remanded for trial on the facts.

The one point presented is both interesting and elusive. The seller is a Canadian corporation. It entered into an agreement with defendant buyers who do business as Keystone Wool…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hocking v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Baetjer v. New England Alcohol Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Dwight v. EckertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Hatcher v. FergusonIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Leonard Seed Co. v. Lustig Burgerhoff Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chemetron Corporation v. McLouth Steel CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  2. Chemetron Corporation v. McLouth Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  3. C. W. Greeson Co. v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Cevdet Aksüt Oğullari Koll. Sti v. CavusogluDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
  5. Coker International, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API