Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Antinoro

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1984No. Supreme Court Disciplinary 347PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Antinoro entered into a contingent fee contract with clients regarding personal injuries suffered in an automobile collision. The contract made no mention of no-fault coverage. OCGA § 33-34-5.

When no-fault payments were made Antinoro endorsed the drafts without permission on behalf of the medical suppliers and used a power of attorney given him by his clients to endorse the drafts on behalf of the clients. Contending that he was entitled to a one-third contingent fee he deposited the money in his escrow account. He then drew checks against the escrow account to pay his personal debts.

In the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Byrd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tifton Bank & Trust Co. v. Knight's Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. In Matter of Robert A. MeierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Matter of ZaleonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Matter of ZaleonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Tifton Bank & Trust Co. v. Knight's Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API