Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Tifton Bank & Trust Co. v. Knight's Furniture Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1994No. A94A1073Published

1ConcurrenceBeasley, Presiding Judge

1. I concur in Division 1 but not in all that is written.

In this case we are eliminating the implied authority of an attorney to endorse the name of the attorney’s client on a negotiable instrument. No longer does this authority arise out of the statutory provision that “[t]he agent’s authority shall be construed to include all necessary and usual means for effectually executing it.” OCGA § 10-6-50. When John Bean Mfg. Co. v. Citizens Bank of Gainesville, 60 Ga. App. 615 (4 SE2d 924) (1939) was decided, that was Code § 4-301.

Both then and now, the Code section continues: “Private instructions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brumbelow v. Northern Propane Gas Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Kaiser & Brother v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Patterson v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Vandiver v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Trust Co. Bank of Augusta N.A. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API