Legal Opinion

Turner v. Crowder

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1928No. 19191PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

W. H. Crowder, defendant in error, as plaintiff, brought, this suit against Fred E. Turn'er, plaintiff in error, as defendant, on a promissory note made by William Neff and the defendant Turner for $3,000 in favor of the Commercial National Bank of Muskogee. The note was indorsed without r'ecourse by the bank in favor of the plaintiff, Crowder.

The defendant, Turner, admitted he was a joint maker with William Neff in favor of the bank. In his answer he alleged that Neff was th'e principal debtor and that he was a surety for Neff and the note was purchased with funds furnished by Neff, who was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. McNary v. Farmers' Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Stocker v. Dobyns-Lantz Hdwe. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parker v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Bell v. Board of Com'rs of Craig CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Wood & Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API