Legal Opinion

Archuleta v. Rose

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 9, 1957No. 17984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Moore

We will refer to defendant in error, who was plaintiff below, as plaintiff or by name, and to plaintiffs in error, defendants below, as defendants or by name.

March 5, 1889, the owners of certain real estate in what is now Adams county made a statutory dedication of a townsite under the name of Irondale, and made and recorded a plat subdividing Irondale into blocks and dedicated to the public use all streets as therein designated.

According to the plat, block 86 lies east of block 87 and the two tracts are separated by a platted north and south street sixty feet in width entitled “third…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lovejoy v. School Dist. No. 46 of Sedgwick CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hartley v. RuybalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  2. Kelly v. MullinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. North Colorado Springs Land & Improvement Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Schutten v. BeckColorado Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API