Legal Opinion

Hartley v. Ruybal

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 9, 1966No. 20673PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Day.

We will refer to the parties by name.

The Hartleys filed a complaint in the district court pursuant to the statutory proceedings under C.R.S. 1963, 118-11-1 to 12 inclusive, alleging that the boundary lines between their property and that of the Ruybals to the north and between their property and that of Martinez to the east of them were in dispute; and that the monuments and corners of the true boundary were not discernible and had been obliterated, lost or destroyed. They prayed for the appointment of a commission to establish the true boundary line separating the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harrison v. EverettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. People v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Rydalch v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Lively v. WickSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. Dye v. DotsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kojima v. Grandote International Ltd. Liability Co. (In Re Grandote Country Club Co.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Terry v. SalazarColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Whittemore v. AmatorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Linville v. RussellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. In Re Grandote Country Club Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API