Legal Opinion

State v. Union Pacific Railroad

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1992No. 90-280PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The question of law presented in this case is whether certain heavy equipment owned by the Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) comes within the definition of “mobile machinery” found in Section 31-2-601, W.S.1977 (June 1989 Repl.). That statute provides:

“(a) As used in this act:
“(i) ‘Mobile machinery’ means heavy equipment, except shop or hand tools or attachments, which is self-propelled, towed or hauled and used primarily in construction and maintenance of roads, bridges, ditches, buildings or land reclamation; * *

In a declaratory judgment action, the UPRR took the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Belco Petroleum Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mealey v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Hayes v. American National Bank of PowellWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. City of Cheyenne v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
  5. BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barcon, Inc. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Pacificorp and Merit Energy Company, LlcWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Eastern Laramie County Solid Waste Disposal District v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API