Legal Opinion

BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1989No. 89-141PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

A statutory construction issue, singularly important to Wyoming oil and gas producers and the Wyoming Department of Revenue and Taxation, is presented for consideration of the severance tax liability of the unit operator defined to be the “person extracting” for production from the Madden Deep Unit as a unitized field. 1 Appellant, BHP Petroleum Company, Inc. (unit operator), by a declaratory judgment complaint, challenged intended assessment on it of all severance tax within the unit. The judgment of the district court validated the unit operator tax assessment and we…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McGuire v. McGuireWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Sanchez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. State Board of ControlWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Trout v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Attletweedt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Department of Revenue & Taxation v. PacificorpWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Wyoming State Tax Com'n v. BHP Petroleum Co. Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Moncrief v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API