State ex rel. Bradford v. Stock
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. On December 13, 1887, the defendants filed a motion for a rehearing, which the court overruled, at its session in February, 1888, and then filed the following opinion.
1Per curiam
Upon the motion for rehearing, the principal questions presented were, first, that the judgment of Hammond v. Garner, rendered May 31, 1878, was a final determination of the matters involved in this case, and that the court in its judgment must have overlooked the provisions of article 7, ch. 36, Comp. Laws of 1885; second, that under the pleadings, *185the illegal votes cast in favor of La Crosse cannot be impeached or excluded.
In The State v. Comm’rs of Hamilton Co., 35 Kas. 643, being a proceeding to determine the county seat of that county, this court said:
“This action was prosecuted in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bobbett v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rld. v. Comm'rs of Jefferson Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Clark v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- State ex rel. Huston v. CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1856
- Chance v. TempleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brooks v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Town of Tallassee v. State Ex Rel. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Baughman v. NationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907