Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Swartz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 21, 1909PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Grayson County. Tried below before Hon, J. W. Hassell.

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Associate Justice.

The appellee, Swartz, recovered a judgment against the appellant in the- Justice Court of Grayson County, for the sum of $92.35 claimed to be due for wages for personal services rendered the appellant as one of its employes. The following is the substance of the agreed statement of facts: The appellee, Sam Swartz, worked for the appellant as a brakeman during the month of April, 1906, and earned as wages the sum of $107.85. These services were performed on the appellant’s line of railway from Denison, Texas, north to Muskogee, Oklahoma, and from Denison south in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DeerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Berry Bros. v. Nelson Davis & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Af-Cap Inc. v. Republic of CongoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Connecticut Bank of Commerce v. Republic of CongoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Armour Fertilizer Works v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  4. Baumgardner v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Strawn Mercantile Co. v. First Nat. Bank of StrawnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API