Legal Opinion

People v. Raquette Falls Land Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1916Published

Motion for leave to amend answer.

1Opinion of the CourtVast Kirk, J.

This is a motion for leave to amend the answer by setting forth a new defense, a Statute of Limitations. The answer was served in January, 1905. A compromise agreement, made by the forest, fish and game commission and the defendant, was entered into and thereafter, by consent of both parties, judgment was entered. In May, 1915, upon application of the plaintiff, the judgment was vacated, and the case went to Judge Irving Vann, official referee, to hear and determine. Proofs were completed and the case submitted to the referee. The defendant then made informal application to the referee ■ for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Deyo v. . MorssNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Muller v. City of PhiladelphiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. Christal v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Doyle v. . CarneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Schmitt v. National Life Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API