Legal Opinion
Knapp v. Ernst & Whinney
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 23, 1996No. Nos. 94-56379, 94-56380 and 94-56381PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Ernst & Whinney appeals from a general jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff class (Knapp). Knapp cross-appeals from the district court’s denial of prejudgment interest and the dismissal of various state-law causes of action. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78aa and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
I
ATV Systems, Inc. (ATV) was founded by Philip Gomez, Douglas O’Connor, and Frank Gleason in 1981. The company specialized in point-of-sale microprocessing systems designed for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Catharina F. Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Research Reports Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In Re Williams Securities Litigation-WCG SubclassCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- McGann v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.