(1996)
Maryland Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Mr. O'Donnell:
You have requested our opinion whether (1) a false statement on a financial disclosure form filed pursuant to the Public Ethics Law could potentially result in a perjury prosecution under Article 27, § 435 of the Maryland Code; and (2) whether financial disclosure statements must be notarized.
Our opinion is as follows:
1. Although the oath on the financial disclosure form omits any reference to "penalties of perjury," this omission does not preclude a perjury prosecution under Article 27, § 435. Nevertheless, so that the form correctly reflects this possibility and does not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Romm v. FlaxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Goldstein v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Greenwald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Collins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.