Legal Opinion

Romm v. Flax

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 5, 1995No. 50PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

The issue before us is whether Maryland Code (1974, 1988 Repl.Vol., 1994 Supp.) § 10-702 of the Real Property Article renders a residential real estate contract void under the circumstances of this case when the seller fails to provide a disclosure or disclaimer statement as required by the statute.

I

On February 19, 1994, Lawrence and Elaine Flax (Flaxes) signed a contract to sell their home in Bethesda to Barry and Marcy Romm (Romms) for $489,000. The Montgomery County Association of Realtors form contract that the Flaxes signed included an addendum entitled “Notice of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. James v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Catonsville Nursing Home, Inc. v. LovemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API