In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Stolarz
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Hancock, Jr., J.
(dissenting). Even though the argument was not advanced in Supreme Court or the Appellate Division, the majority of this Court now concludes that the controlling case of Matter of United Community Ins. Co. v Mucatel (127 Misc 2d 1045, affd without opn 119 AD2d 1017, affd for reasons stated at Special Term 69 NY2d 777) does not apply; that there never was any conflict between New Jersey and New York law; and that the reduction in coverage clause was valid all along in either State. Having thus removed both the controlling New York decision and the conflicts issue from the case,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Borg-Warner Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SteckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.