Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vavricka v. Mid-Continent-Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1943No. 31435Published

1DissentMessmore, J.

I respectfully dissent from that part of the opinion with reference to tender. This is an action at law to rescind a contract for the purchase of stock. The general rule is stated in Building & Loan Ass’n of Dakota v. Cameron, 48 Neb. 124, 66 N. W. 1109, as follows: “It has been often held, and may be regarded as elementary law, that one who seeks to rescind a contract on the ground of fraud must offer to return the property or consideration received therefor by him, provided it be of any value, within a reasonable time.” Citing Clark v. Tennant, 5 Neb. 549; Brown v. Waters, 7 Neb. 424;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. American Building & Loan Ass'n v. RainboltNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Collins v. HughesNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Loomis v. PeaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Clark v. TennantNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  5. J. B. Alfree Manufacturing Co. v. GrapeNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API