Legal Opinion

Chalk v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 19, 1993No. 23905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted certiorari to review the circuit court’s denial of petitioner’s application for postconviction relief (PCR). We agree with petitioner’s contention that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to request a King 1 charge and a self-defense charge pursuant to State v. Hendrix. 2 We reverse the denial of PCR and remand for a new trial.

Petitioner was charged with murder. Based on the evidence adduced at trial the jury was charged on murder, manslaughter, and self-defense. The first issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to ask the jury be instructed that it resolve…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cherry v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. HendrixSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brightman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Brightman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API