Legal Opinion
United States v. Hurn
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided April 23, 2003No. 00-0301/MCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
After the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the Appellant’s conviction and sentence1 (United States v. Hurn, 52 M.J. 629 (N.M.Ct. Crim.App.1999)), this Court remanded the record for a factfinding hearing regarding the prosecution’s reasons for exercising its peremptory challenge against the only non-Caucasian officer on the court-martial panel, Lieutenant Colonel (LtCol) Ayala. United *200States v. Hurn, 55 M.J. 446 (C.A.A.F.2001). Having reviewed the record of the factfinding hearing, we now affirm the decision below.
At trial, the trial counsel had responded to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. TullochCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. HurnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. AllenNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- Glenn Hurn v. Steve KallisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Hurn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. Private First Class WILLIE J. BOSTICKArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017