Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 1992No. 89CA1576PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge METZGER.

In response to various robbery and drug charges, defendant, Daryl S. Martin, pled not guilty by reason of insanity, but upon trial of the sanity issue, he was found sane. Thereafter, in a trial on the merits, he was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery of a controlled substance, two counts of crimes of violence, possession of a controlled substance, and one count of conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery of a *188controlled substance. He appeals, asserting that error was committed during both the sanity trial and the trial on the merits. We affirm.

On July 13,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Kogan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Leonardo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. People v. SchuettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. SerravoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lehnert v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  2. People v. StellabotteColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. People v. GalimanisColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. People v. TrujilloColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Bristol Bay Productions, LLC v. LampackColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API