D & L Construction Co. & Associates v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION AND' PLAINTIFF’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SKELTON, Judge.
This controversy, as the one in D & L Construction Co. & Associates v. United States, Ct.Cl. No. 281-65, 378 F.2d 675, decided this day, had its origin in the-attempted construction of a Capehart housing project.
In this action which arises upon cross, motions for summary judgment, plaintiff seeks to recover $59,691, which includes-the total of its application fee paid to' the. Federal Housing Administration (hereinafter referred to as “FHA”) in connection with applications for mortgage insurance commitments…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- W. G. Cornell Company of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- J. W. Bateson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Terminal Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- D & L Construction Co. & Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lindy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976