Kareem Blount v. Taylor Talasky (P.A.), et al.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KAREEM BLOUNT, : Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:26-cv-126 v. : (JUDGE MANNION) TAYLOR TALASKY (P.A.), et al., : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Currently before the Court are pro se Plaintiff Kareem Blount (“Blount”)’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP Application”) and complaint in which he asserts causes of action under 42 U.S.C. §1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“RA”), and Pennsylvania state tort law. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant the IFP…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.