Legal Opinion
Auto Paint & Supplies Co. v. Hale
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 1981No. 8520PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUIDRY, Judge.
In this matter third party intervenor, James E. McCrory, seeks to enjoin a judicial sale of certain movable property allegedly subject to foreclosure at the instance of plaintiff in the principal action, Auto Paint and Supplies Company, Inc. (hereafter APASCO).
In the principal action, APASCO secured a money judgment in the sum of $1,370.71 against the defendant, Huey H. Hale. That judgment, rendered on January 13, 1981, recognized plaintiff’s special lien and chattel mortgage on certain movable property described as “(1) new Speedair compressor model 7Z486 with five (5)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. BratsosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Union Bldg. Corporation v. BurmeisterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Valley Securities Co. v. De RousselLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. LawsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- All State Credit Plan Houma, Inc. v. FournierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sandoz v. First National Bank of Lafayette, LA. (In Re Exclusive Industries Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1984
- Auto Paint & Supplies Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Harris v. Akchin (In re R & L Furniture Co.)District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1985
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010