United States v. Paxton
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEffron, Chief Judge
Trial counsel’s sentencing argument provided the members with an erroneous portrayal of the evidence of record. Trial counsel compounded his misstatement of facts by making an argument that encouraged the members to draw adverse inferences from Appellant’s exercise of his right to plead not guilty and his right to remain silent. I respectfully dissent from the portion of the majority opinion that concludes that any error in trial counsel’s argument was not plain or obvious.
The errors occurred during trial counsel’s attempt to describe the evidence and responsibilities of the panel during…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. EdwardsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. HaneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006