Legal Opinion

Noble v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 17, 1989No. 88-1058PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The first point on appeal is whether the state’s playing of a tape recorded statement in which the defendant invoked his right to remain silent constitutes fundamental error. It does not. Simpson v. State, 418 So.2d 984 (Fla.1982); Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978).

The defendant/appellant also claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel. This may only be raised in a direct appeal when the facts giving rise to such claim are apparent on the face of the record or when conflict of interest or prejudice to the defendant is shown. Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla.1982); State v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. State v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  4. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  5. Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McMullen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Odeh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API