Brown Shoe Co. v. Shor
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtPelphrey, C. J.
Plaintiff in error sued out a writ of garnishment against defendant in error in the county court at law, No. 1, of Dallas county, Tex. Defendant in error answered not indebted, which answer - was controverted by plaintiff in error. Upon a trial before the court judgment was rendered in favor of defendant in error and an appeal has’ been prosecuted to this court.
At the request of plaintiff in error, the trial court filed the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
“Findings of Fact.
“1. Plaintiff is the owner and holder of a valid and subsisting judgment rendered on December 5, 1961,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Houston Cotton Oil Co. v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1903
- Keating v. VaughnTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Patty-Joiner & Eubank Co. v. CumminsTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Star v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Foreman v. BurnetteTexas Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCray v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Endicott-Johnson Corp. v. J. I. ShorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933