Legal Opinion

Grober v. Kahn

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 28, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

83 N.J. Super. 382 (1964)

200 A.2d 130

MAURICE W. GROBER, PLAINTIFF,

v.

HERMAN KAHN, GERTRUDE KAHN, ALICE BROOKS AND CAROL WEINTRAUB, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided April 28, 1964.

Mr. Israel B. Greene for plaintiff (Messrs. Greene & Orloff, attorneys).

Mr. Adrian M. Unger for defendants (Messrs. Milton M. & Adrian M. Unger, attorneys).

MINTZ, J.S.C.

In this proceeding plaintiff essentially sought to establish his interest in a joint venture and demanded an accounting from defendants Herman Kahn, his wife and two daughters. He additionally contended that Herman…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Sunset Beach Amusement Corp. v. BelkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Midler v. HeinowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Sarner v. SarnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  5. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. United SteelworkersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grober v. KahnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Grober v. KahnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API