Legal Opinion

Barbour v. International Union

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 4, 2010No. 08-1740PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part; vacated and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the opinion, in which Judge SEYMOUR joined. Senior Judge HAMILTON wrote a separate opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.

OPINION

AGEE, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal we first consider whether removal of the case from state to federal court was timely. Holding that the notice of removal was timely filed, we then determine whether the district court possessed subject matter jurisdiction over the case based on the doctrine of complete preemption. For the reasons that follow,…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barbour v. International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  2. Marchese v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  3. Alston v. Baltimore Gas & Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
  4. Alston v. Baltimore Gas & Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  5. Barbour v. International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API