Legal Opinion

Seeright v. Fletcher

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1843PublishedCited by 14 opinions

*APPEAL from the Marion 'Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivaN, J.

Debt' by Fletcher against Seeright and one Sloan on a delivery-bond. The declaration contained two counts; one on the bond, the other on the bond setting out the condition. Sloan, the principal obligor, was not taken, and the process as to him, was returned “ not found.” Seeright appeared and craved oyer oí the bond and the condition, and pleaded to each count separately: 1, Non est factum. 2, Fraud generally. 3, A special plea of fraud, alleging that the constable who made the levy and took the bond for the delivery of the property named in said condition, &c., falsely and fraudulently…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gatling v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Robinson v. GlassIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Nebeker v. CutsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Rogers v. PlaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Miller v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API