Legal Opinion

Willey v. Nichols

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1898No. 2772PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

Plaintiffs commenced an action against defendants upon an injunction bond executed by defendant Nichols as principal and Phipps and Parker as sureties in the sum of $200. The bond was executed in consideration of the issuance of a temporary injunction in a suit then instituted by Nichols against the plaintiff George J. Willey. Afterwards the injunction was dissolved because wrongfully issued and plaintiffs in this action allege that they were damaged in the sum of $1,500 by reason of the issuance of the writ of injunction. They further allege…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chipman v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Nichols v. . DrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Adams v. StevensNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  4. McKenzie v. HattonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Borg v. BringhurstWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Duffy v. BlakeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. McCormick v. Index Stages, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Bank of California v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API