State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Becker, A.C.J.
— Archie Miller appeals his conviction of two counts of murder in the first degree. The prosecutor, in rebuttal argument, commented that Miller had the opportunity to tailor his testimony after hearing all the other *284witnesses. Miller contends this was an improper comment on his constitutional right to be present at trial. A recent decision of the United States Supreme Court holds that such an argument does not violate a constitutional right. That decision effectively overrules our Washington precedent that holds to the contrary. The conviction is affirmed.
In the State’s rebuttal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Portuondo v. AgardSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.