Legal Opinion

In re McDonald

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1985No. 8426DC233PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Respondents first assign error to the admission of the testimony of Betty Dibrell as to the results of Mr. McDonald’s breathalyzer reading on 28 March 1983. The basis of their objection is that petitioner failed to lay a proper foundation for the in*237troduction of these results into evidence. Robinson v. Insurance Co., 255 N.C. 669, 122 S.E. 2d 801 (1961) (describing requisite foundation for admissibility of blood alcohol test). Ms. Dibrell, an employee of the Randolph Clinic, an outpatient alcoholism treatment facility, testified that she is the custodian of clinic business…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Matter of BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. In Re ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of CaldwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. MATTER OF McDONALDCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Union County Department of Social Services ex rel. Herrell v. MullisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. In re K.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API