Ray v. Parker
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
EDMONDS, J., Dissenting.
I do not know, nor do I consider it the judicial function to decide—as the majority of this court has done—that “producers and distributors of milk and the consuming public will benefit more under the protective wing of the act than they did under the destructive practices and influences” of free competition in the mik industry. Price fixing legislation is still in an experimental stage, and its ultimate worth as an economic policy is a question for the people of the state to decide. This court’s only duty is to determine whether the legislature, in the particular…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.