Anderson v. Schust Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
Plaintiff, administratrix of the estate of II. Firth Anderson, deceased, brought suit against the Schust Company to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s decedent. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Judgment having been directed for defendant by the trial court, the testimony introduced must be construed in its light most favorable to plaintiff.
The only question involved is whether such testimony was sufficient, in law, to make it incumbent upon the trial court to submit the case to the jury. Plaintiff says it was sufficient. Defendant claims it was insufficient.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Loux v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Eberle Brewing Co. v. Briscoe Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by12 opinions
- Renda v. International Union, UAWMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Martin v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Shinabarger v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Herndon v. UAW Local No 3Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Sheathelm v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.