Dixon v. Parker, Moran & Parker
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered January 6, 1917, upon findings favorable to the plaintiffs, as against one defendant, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, C. J.
This is an action at law to recover moneys claimed to he due on account of work performed hy plaintiffs, Dixon and Oliver, for defendants Parker, Moran & Parker. The facts are as follows: The city of Spokane, in February, 1912, passed an ordinance requiring the Northern Pacific Railway Company to separate the grade of its tracks from that of the streets within a portion of the city by elevating its tracks and changing the grade of certain streets. The ordinance required the railway company to bear all the expense of making the change and do all the work, except the replacing of such sewers…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. ElySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Detamore v. HindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Chicago v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Buncombe County Commissioners v. TommeySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Murphy v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Skinner & Eddy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Rood v. HortonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- R. H. Freitag Manufacturing Co. v. Boeing Airplane Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Seiffert Co. v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Barbo v. NorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1926