Legal Opinion
In Re Ja. J.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 2002No. 01-FS-1229 to 01-FS-1231PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
T.J., the mother of Ja.J., Je.J. and M.J., appeals from an order terminating her parental rights. We affirm, being unpersuaded by T.J.’s claims that the trial court abused its discretion in rejecting her choice of caretakers and in overestimating the adoption prospects of the two boys, Ja.J. and Je.J. See In re A.R., 679 A.2d 470, 474 (D.C.1996).
Preliminarily, we have jurisdiction of this appeal notwithstanding that T.J. filed her notice of appeal before the trial court had ruled on her pending motion for reconsideration. Even if the appeal was premature, as the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re A.B.E.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In re T.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re A.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re A.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Dyer v. William S. Bergman & Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re A.T.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re K.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re R.E.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In re C.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re ATADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.